|
|
| Строка 1: |
Строка 1: |
| − | Each one seems to vary on the subject of boutique hotels: on what is and what is not; on where they are to be set up and where not; taking place their best pricing policy and the true economics; by their transform condition otherwise long-term assurance. Clothed in special, taking place what to call the market sector.
| + | Content removed |
| − | On two issues, a large amount commentators agree. So-called boutique hotels look in healthier ad affect than traditional sequence hotels. Plus it all ongoing, as hence a lot of trends achieve, in London. Twenty time before, in a South Kensington side road, Anouska Hempel finished her name, added distinctively than always she had as an actress, with Blake’s. It had about 50 accommodation, a little of them as petite as broom cupboards, a dauntingly cool bar, and the blackest hole of a restaurant that any one always overpriced in this often overpriced metropolis. And if you were a rock and revolve picture otherwise an actor under 50, you stayed at Blake’s if you were anyone.
| |
| − | Around this calculate, Tom Wolfe had printed a little-regarded essay in Rolling Mineral magazine, unrestricted ‘Funky Chic’. (This piece was greatly overshadowed by its predecessor, ‘Radical Chic’, which satirised Pristine York’s über-liberal elite as it entertained Black Panthers in the Bernsteins’ extravagant residential home, on the contrary in its way it described a added significant and lasting phenomenon.) Funky well-dressed was a disease that spread, Wolfe asserted grandiloquently, starting Chelsea’s famous Casino Dell Arethusa roughly the world, through Paris to California’s Troubadour
| |
| − | and Whisky-a-Go-Go (where Elton John was truly launched). Rider Wolfe had stayed his hand, he would have seen his disease attain its fullest flowering in Pristine York’s Studio 54, the now notorious basis camp in support of assorted cokeheads, entertainment entrepreneurs, and its notable founders, Steve Rubell and Ian Schrager.
| |
| − | In a similar feature, the funky attractive of so-called boutique hotels spread from Blake’s (via Paris’ L’Hotel in Be remorseful des Beaux Arts with its Oscar Wilde pedigree), to attain fame and fortune by America’s West Coast next to LA’s Mondrian, and in Pristine York’s authoritative to start with declaration, Morgans (est. 1984, hold up. I Schrager). Life imitating art, kindness imitating rock and roll.
| |
| − | American commentators find it easier to demarcate the boutique hotel and classify it as a market sector than solve its British exponents. Olga Polizzi (profiled soon in this issue) accepts that her Hotel Tresanton might ensue described as such on the contrary doubts whether the boutique’s most quoted progenitor actually creates boutique hotels.
| |
| − | ‘Schrager’s not truly boutique. Personage, poles apart, nevertheless not boutique as far-flung as I’m worried. Boutique means small, pretty minor rooms and idiosyncratic in a cottagey way.’ Would she illustrate, next to with some commentators, Lodge du Vin as a boutique? ‘No. I’d call it a sunny chain.’ Its founder, Robin Hutson, is not hence definite what's more. ‘I don’t know what it (boutique) means, in reality. I don’t know what we call ourselves but boutique is quicker than mainly possessions, though it’s not brilliant.’ (There is a suspicion that Hutson had a better description of this hotel sector in his original company name, but more of that anon.)
| |
| − | So if soi-disant boutique hoteliers find the description less than optimal, why use it? For three reasons. Because it provides some common currency and thus permits debate. Second, because it is widely used in the US, the world’s biggest hospitality market. Third, because, as a result, market data has been collated and analysed on the basis of a defined US hotel market sector. Read more: [http://www.hotel.sc4.pl Hotel].
| |
