|
|
| Строка 1: |
Строка 1: |
| − | It is widely believed that most for us live within our own homes. However, many people are tenants renting residences from private landlords, councils and also housing associations. At the heart of landlord and tenant law may be the tension between two conflicting interests; those of tenants and the wonderful of landlords.
| + | Content removed |
| − | | |
| − | Housing law attempts to strike a balance between allowing people to make profits off their properties, and providing tenants using affordable housing. On the main hand, landlords need to make profits to be able to maintain their properties to your standards set out with the law. On the many other hand, tenants require housing that is both decent and inexpensive.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The other important trouble is security of tenure. Again, the law tries to strike a stabilize between how easily landlords are able to repossess their properties, and the amount of security tenants have on their homes. If landlords are to invest in residential property to boost the supply of housing, then they have to be confident of to be able to remove their tenants in order to sell their assets. Without this right their own properties would lose high of their value. Tenants obviously want the right to stay providing possible, as moving property is both expensive together with time-consuming.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Landlords feel that casing law favours tenants for some reasons. Firstly, landlords ought to maintain their properties to high standards put down by the government, even though tenants do not pay for the rent. Secondly, if tenants breach their tenancy and the landlord is forced to help evict them, the courts will normally only award a % of the landlord's legal costs associated with repossessing property. Thirdly, if tenants don't want to leave a property, landlords have to undergo a lengthy legal process that usually takes between 4 and few months to successfully evict tenants.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Landlords feel that the law is especially biased towards tenants in regards to repossessing property. To be successful in obtaining a possession order to get a property, a valid notice may be the starting point. The notice will be scrutinised by a judge and the tenants' legal representatives, who ? re typically specialist housing lawyers. Notices are given away freely by many organisations and appearance simple to complete. Nevertheless, this is not the result, and landlords frequently make mistakes costing them a few months of delay.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Landlords should also be aware that there are many possibilities for tenants to defend themselves totally free through government-sponsored lawyers. Each time a defence is filed the legal costs to the landlord escalate as increased hearing dates are arranged. Tenants often benefit from free solicitors, while landlords do not. Therefore it is fundamental that landlords obtain professional advice from a property solicitor at the outset, so that they don't end up being involved in expensive to defend cases that could get easily been avoided.
| |
| − | | |
| − | It can be argued that housing law does favour tenants. Nevertheless, landlords rent property out to make profits. Therefore like any other business decision process, they need to include the additional expenses that law imposes on them within their business plans, before buying residential property.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | [http://www.housingcourt.net stop eviction]
| |
