Food Safety — различия между версиями

Текущая версия на 19:25, 1 апреля 2013

In France, about exactly the same time frame, A la Table de Spanghero, a French primarily based meat processing company that supplied Findus (a frozen meals brand), was found to become the supplier of beef goods that contained horse DNA. Of 18 beef lasagna goods examined, 11 had been good for horse DNA; containing involving 60 - 100% horsemeat. It had been found the horsemeat originated in Romania, sold to a further French enterprise called Comigal and created the adulterated solution in Luxembourg.

    Nestle, a Swiss based enterprise, on 18 February 2013, found two of their beef pasta items had been constructive for more than 1% horse DNA and led towards the withdrawal of pasta products in Italy, Spain and France.  The adulterated meat was procured through a sub-contractor known as HJ Schypke.  Also in February, Birdseye, selling chile con carne solution in Belgium, unveiled that testing located horse DNA was inside the solution and withdrew three items for sale that contained beef procured in the Uk via its supplier; a Belgium firm named Frigilunch.

    What do every one of these situations inform us?  Well, they inform us a minimum of three significant factors.  One is the fact that the provide chain for beef throughout Europe (at the same time as a lot of other solutions and services) impact not only one tiny regional area as was the situation numerous many years ago.  Now that our planet is shrinking with regards to entry of services and solutions, the affects of mismanagement, accidents and intentional fraud impacts not only a couple of members of a tiny neighborhood; but a large population scattered over numerous nations with magnified political, well being and financial ramifications.

    2nd, there was a major failure in the inspection of your supply chain that allowed this to take place.  In reviewing several of the horsemeat scandal situations, the suppliers have been deep inside the provide chain rather than commonly the initial or second big supplier with the products inside the chain.  This tells me the inspectors with the product weren't performing a total supply chain inspection with the product and more than probably focused their interest around the ultimate phases with the procedure where it had been usually found, through high-priced laboratory testing, the product was adulterated.  This might have already been prevented if the supply chain on the product was effectively managed, physically followed and inspected by competent specialists to ensure the provide chain was thoroughly vetted.

    Third, many of these firms have trusted their key suppliers because they've employed precisely the same suppliers for years with small or no difficulties.  Now, resulting from the expansion from the supply chain and also the big amount of territory it covers, it is actually a more hard task to make sure that the whole supply chain is safely managed.  It is now far more critical than ever to make sure that both a food safety and meals defense viewpoint is imbued in the everyday duties of all members on the supply chain.  Sadly, this perspective is just not accessible or existing in lots of businesses now.   

    What is necessary now in Europe, as is in every element from the world, is an unbiased method that assists providers in assessing the state of their supply chain in order that they will make an truthful assessment of where they presently stand with regards to obtaining a protected food supply chain; secure from accidental and intentional contamination. GMO, USDA, Food Safety Modernization Act