Customer Service, Social Media, and Contact Centers — различия между версиями
(Новая: The Wall Avenue Journal experienced an post not extended in the past "Murky Drinking water Below Facebook Disclosure" which explained an celebration exactly where the CEO of Netflix [ht...) |
м (Customer_Service,_Social_Media,_and_Contact_Centers) |
||
| Строка 1: | Строка 1: | ||
| − | + | So as mother and father, we instruct our little ones about these issues, but what about in a company location, or as a business operator? What about a company govt of a public firm, 1 with shareholders, stockholders, and traders? When it comes to that factors get a little more critical, and if you say the wrong factor there could be critical repercussions, and you may possibly even be violating securities legal guidelines. Ok so let's speak about this since the issue has appear to the forefront now. | |
| − | + | The Wall Street Journal experienced an report not long ago "Murky H2o Underneath Facebook Disclosure" which described an function exactly where the CEO of Netflix [http://www.followertrade.com/register.php social media exchange] produced some remarks on Fb, and right after he did the stock price went up 8% just on his submit. Apparently enough, this is considerably of a typical incidence in social media these days, as it has been taking place far more and far more. The Securities Trade Commission is trying to determine what to do about it. Do they make special or various rules for company executives when it comes to their private right to cost-free speech? | |
| − | + | What happens when an executive posts a tweet about his dissatisfaction of business earnings or results, and then executes a trade offering millions of shares two-minutes later on or perhaps 30-seconds later on? In that situation he did alert the community as to his insider details prior to promoting. But who may see that within that very same time frame. So you see, this issue can go equally methods. An individual might use it to pump up their inventory at a time when they are selling (pump and dump) which is certainly unacceptable - or they may say some thing and then claim it actually didn't make a difference due to the fact it was just on some social media website. | |
| − | + | One more govt may possibly say that they posted to the information to the public on a community social media internet site, and for that reason everyone knew in advance, so they did nothing at all mistaken. The actuality is the SEC or Securities Trade Commission does not have policies and restrictions which strictly prohibits, or think about that on the internet system the identical as the mass media. Possibly it's time for the SEC to come into the 21st century. New policies and regulations are needed, but till then, is it just a free of charge-for-all? | |
| − | + | Will some government down the street uncover themselves the target of the SEC as the company tries to make a title for alone and begin to regulate what is explained on social media, and what about cost-free speech? In the previous the SEC hasn't actually cared as well much about free of charge speech, as they claim they are protecting the traders which is in their opinion is a lot more essential. | |
| − | + | Who is correct, and who is mistaken? Perhaps it is much better to have policies and restrictions so that when these types of circumstances go to court there are at the very least some floor rules which are comprehended by all functions. The consumer can request far more pictures and information of the product, one thing which is [http://www.followertrade.com social media exchange] fairly difficult to do on ebay. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Текущая версия на 01:27, 9 апреля 2013
So as mother and father, we instruct our little ones about these issues, but what about in a company location, or as a business operator? What about a company govt of a public firm, 1 with shareholders, stockholders, and traders? When it comes to that factors get a little more critical, and if you say the wrong factor there could be critical repercussions, and you may possibly even be violating securities legal guidelines. Ok so let's speak about this since the issue has appear to the forefront now.
The Wall Street Journal experienced an report not long ago "Murky H2o Underneath Facebook Disclosure" which described an function exactly where the CEO of Netflix social media exchange produced some remarks on Fb, and right after he did the stock price went up 8% just on his submit. Apparently enough, this is considerably of a typical incidence in social media these days, as it has been taking place far more and far more. The Securities Trade Commission is trying to determine what to do about it. Do they make special or various rules for company executives when it comes to their private right to cost-free speech?
What happens when an executive posts a tweet about his dissatisfaction of business earnings or results, and then executes a trade offering millions of shares two-minutes later on or perhaps 30-seconds later on? In that situation he did alert the community as to his insider details prior to promoting. But who may see that within that very same time frame. So you see, this issue can go equally methods. An individual might use it to pump up their inventory at a time when they are selling (pump and dump) which is certainly unacceptable - or they may say some thing and then claim it actually didn't make a difference due to the fact it was just on some social media website.
One more govt may possibly say that they posted to the information to the public on a community social media internet site, and for that reason everyone knew in advance, so they did nothing at all mistaken. The actuality is the SEC or Securities Trade Commission does not have policies and restrictions which strictly prohibits, or think about that on the internet system the identical as the mass media. Possibly it's time for the SEC to come into the 21st century. New policies and regulations are needed, but till then, is it just a free of charge-for-all?
Will some government down the street uncover themselves the target of the SEC as the company tries to make a title for alone and begin to regulate what is explained on social media, and what about cost-free speech? In the previous the SEC hasn't actually cared as well much about free of charge speech, as they claim they are protecting the traders which is in their opinion is a lot more essential.
Who is correct, and who is mistaken? Perhaps it is much better to have policies and restrictions so that when these types of circumstances go to court there are at the very least some floor rules which are comprehended by all functions. The consumer can request far more pictures and information of the product, one thing which is social media exchange fairly difficult to do on ebay.
