Материал из Wiki Mininuniver
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску
|
|
| (не показана 1 промежуточная версия этого же участника) |
| Строка 1: |
Строка 1: |
| − | The story, highlighted by numerous rollover deaths, remained in the news for months, and had a extreme influence on the manufacturer. Among other factors, angry buyers usually had been told that replacement tires were not in stock. The recall did not go smoothly. Congressional investigations followe...<br><br>Firestone had to undertake a massive tire recall back in 2000 involving tires made for SUVs. Out of some 14 million sold, the approximately 6.five million still on the road were recalled.<br><br>The story, highlighted by several rollover deaths, remained in the news for months, and had a serious influence on the manufacturer. Among other items, angry buyers usually had been told that replacement tires were not in stock. The recall did not go smoothly. Congressional investigations followed, and new tire security legislation was enacted.<br><br>Reminiscent of these days are two recent tire recalls involving the very same defect that prompted the 2000 recall, namely tread separation and high failure rates, risking harmful blowouts. The danger is exacerbated in hot summer time months.<br><br>Now, as if there are not enough woes with recalls of Chinese goods, you can to the list of tire recalls some 450,000 tires imported from China. This recall is specially troublesome as will become evident from the story.<br><br>The current issue arises out of instances of tread separation of truck tires sold to U.S. distributors. The tires are light truck radials imported from the Hangzhou Zhongce Rubber Co. positioned in Hangzhou, China. The dilemma is compounded by the reality that the recall does not involve a manufacturer that has a significant U.S presence like Firestone.<br><br>In reality, the importer is a small New Jersey company with only six personnel which lacks the funds to implement a recall. It does not even have a warehouse. Apparently the tires are drop shipped from the manufacturer straight to U.S. distributors. The Chinese business is not being cooperative according to the [http://autorepairdenver.com/ auto repair in denver] National Highway Targeted traffic Security Administration (NHTSA). There allegedly have been two rollover deaths attributable to the tires.<br><br>The NHTSA has received some criticism based on indications that it was informed of the issue as early as 2005 and took [http://autorepairdenver.com/automobile-tires/ automobile tires] no action.<br><br>Another recall just occurred (in [http://autorepairdenver.com/free-chilton-auto-repair-manual/ my free chilton auto repair manual] 2007) involving the Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. Once again, the hazard is tread separation dangers with about 92,000 light truck tires. Cooper denies that there is any defect, but is cooperating in performing a recall. Cooper had previously imported tires from the Hangzhou manufacturer, but ceased in 2005. The tires recalled in 2007 had been produced in the U.S. Cooper is the second largest U.S. tire manufacturer.<br><br>Although it really is comforting to know the these defects are being identified, it seems that from a consumer point of view, the enormous recall in 2000, coupled with subsequent federal legislation, ought to have eliminated tread separation troubles. Evidently this is not the situation. Clearly, shoppers should not be complacent about tire security issues which continue to plague the tire sector in the form of tread separation dangers.
| + | Content removed |
Текущая версия на 23:23, 26 декабря 2025
