Материал из Wiki Mininuniver
Перейти к навигацииПерейти к поиску
|
|
| Строка 1: |
Строка 1: |
| − | By "How?" I'm not talking about formatting. That's covered in "How JOE and Other Internet Sources Should Be Cited in JOE," another link on Help for JOE Authors.
| + | Content removed |
| − | I'm talking about how you can use JOE citations to strengthen your own article.
| |
| − | Too many authors feel that the only relevant JOE articles are those on the exact same subjects of their own articles, but that's not necessarily the case.
| |
| − | Perhaps there are, for example, a number of articles on 4-H recruitment, but none on the importance of parents in the process. You could cite a few of those recruitment articles and make the point that your article fills a gap in the scholarship.
| |
| − | Maybe there are a number of articles on your subject—even your exact same subject—but your research contradicts or amends the findings reported in those articles or takes a different tack. What better way to establish your point and underscore the originality and importance of your article than by citing a few of them?
| |
| − | Or perhaps your article validates work that has been done by others or adds to it. Citing those works is a way of adding credibility to your article.
| |
| − | Citing JOE articles is also helpful because many JOE readers are much more familiar with JOE than they are with other scholarly journals and because JOE articles are easily retrievable.
| |
| − | What I wrote in "What's Wrong Skimpy References Sections?" (yet another link on Help for JOE Authors) about contributing to the [http://sitetest.com test word] scholarly dialogue holds doubly true for JOE articles and the JOE scholarly dialogue.
| |
Версия 22:27, 26 декабря 2025
