~Delete 34967 - История изменений

Moderator: Moderator переименовал страницу Tumblr в ~Delete 34967: Spam

2025-12-26T21:24:20Z

Moderator переименовал страницу Tumblr в ~Delete 34967: Spam

Moderator: Spam cleanup

2025-12-26T21:24:19Z

Spam cleanup

Weasel51nylon: tumblr

2013-03-29T23:14:39Z

tumblr

Weasel51nylon: Новая: Many of us have been hoping that it would go away. In Brett Tabke's 5/18 Robots.txt entry, he echoed a sentiment that many, many webmasters hold on to as a hope: What happens to all...

2013-03-29T23:14:26Z

Новая: Many of us have been hoping that it would go away. In Brett Tabke's 5/18 Robots.txt entry, he echoed a sentiment that many, many webmasters hold on to as a hope: What happens to all...

Новая страница

Many of us have been hoping that it would go away. In Brett Tabke's 5/18 Robots.txt entry, he echoed a sentiment that many, many webmasters hold on to as a hope:

What happens to all those Wavers that think [i]Getting Links = SEO[/i] when that majority of the Google algo is devalued in various ways? Wavers built their fortunes on "links=seo". When that goes away, the Wavers have zero to hold on to.

The pertinent questions:

Will link building still be very important for rankings in the medium term?
When will link popularity be devalued in favor of other algo elements (that are less tedious, from a webmaster's point of view)?

The answers:

Sorry, but link building is still going to be the SEO trump card for the foreseeable future.
I wouldn't hold your breath for search engine algorithms to place less importance on link popularity until the Semantic Web arrives, or maybe when HTTP gets replaced by a new protocol. Because links are still the basic connector, the basic relationship, on the Web. And for the forseeable future they're going to be the easiest way for a computer program to judge the importance and trustworthiness of a Web page.

What will happen to the way search algorithms score links is already happening. The Google algo has become much more elegant and advanced, devaluing staggering amount of links that shouldn't count, and placing more emphasis on trusted links. And the trust and juice given by those links is then verified by elements like user data, domain age, and other relatively hard-to-spoof factors.

But please, don't fool yourself. Links that should count are still the key to rankings (in Google, at least — and MSN and Yahoo! are only a few short years behind). In that spirit, Aaron and I have created our 101 Ways to Build (and Not Build) Links. (Yeah, it just so happened that there were exactly 101!)

[http://wpblackhat.com/wpblog/tumblr-for-seo-is-it-worth-it/ tumblr search engine optimization]

← Предыдущая		Версия 21:24, 26 декабря 2025
Строка 1:		Строка 1:
−	~~Many of us have been hoping that it would go away. In Brett Tabke's 5/18 Robots.txt entry, he echoed a sentiment that many, many webmasters hold on to as a hope:~~	+	Content removed
−
−	What happens to all those Wavers that think [i]Getting Links = SEO[/i] when that majority of the Google algo is devalued in various ways? Wavers built their fortunes on "links=seo". When that goes away, the Wavers have zero to hold on to.
−
−	~~The pertinent questions:~~
−
−	~~Will link building still be very important for rankings in the medium term?~~
−	~~When will link popularity be devalued in favor of other algo elements (that are less tedious, from a webmaster's point of view)?~~
−
−	~~The answers:~~
−
−	~~Sorry, but link building is still going to be the SEO trump card for the foreseeable future.~~
−	I wouldn't hold your breath for search engine algorithms to place less importance on link popularity until the Semantic Web arrives, or maybe when HTTP gets replaced by a new protocol. Because links are still the basic connector, the basic relationship, on the Web. And for the forseeable future they're going to be the easiest way for a computer program to judge the importance and trustworthiness of a Web page.
−
−	What will happen to the way search algorithms score links is already happening. The Google algo has become much more elegant and advanced, devaluing staggering amount of links that shouldn't count, and placing more emphasis on trusted links. And the trust and juice given by those links is then verified by elements like user data, domain age, and other relatively hard-to-spoof factors.
−
−	But please, don't fool yourself. Links that should count are still the key to rankings (in Google, at least — and MSN and Yahoo! are only a few short years behind). In that spirit, Aaron and I have created our 101 Ways to Build (and Not Build) Links. (Yeah, it just so happened that there were exactly 101!)
−
−	~~[http://wpblackhat.com/wpblog/tumblr-for-seo-is-it-worth-it/ best way of using tumblr for seo]~~

← Предыдущая		Версия 23:14, 29 марта 2013
Строка 17:		Строка 17:
	But please, don't fool yourself. Links that should count are still the key to rankings (in Google, at least — and MSN and Yahoo! are only a few short years behind). In that spirit, Aaron and I have created our 101 Ways to Build (and Not Build) Links. (Yeah, it just so happened that there were exactly 101!)		But please, don't fool yourself. Links that should count are still the key to rankings (in Google, at least — and MSN and Yahoo! are only a few short years behind). In that spirit, Aaron and I have created our 101 Ways to Build (and Not Build) Links. (Yeah, it just so happened that there were exactly 101!)

−	[http://wpblackhat.com/wpblog/tumblr-for-seo-is-it-worth-it/ tumblr ~~search engine optimization~~]	+	[http://wpblackhat.com/wpblog/tumblr-for-seo-is-it-worth-it/ best way of using tumblr for seo]

← Предыдущая	Версия 21:24, 26 декабря 2025
(нет различий)